Dating rocks using fossils

Many people assume that the dates scientists quote of millions of years are as reliable as our knowledge of the structure of the atom or nuclear power.And radioactive dating is so shrouded with mystery that many don’t even try to understand how the method works; they just believe it must be right.If, in the year AD 1600, you had asked an educated European how old the planet Earth was and to recount its history he would have said that it was about 6000 years old and that its ancient history was given by the biblical account in Genesis.If you asked the same question of an educated European in AD 1900 you would have received a quite different answer.We note that at the instant the swimmer touches the end of the pool our wristwatch reads and 53 seconds.How long has the competitor taken to swim the race?

dating rocks using fossils-5dating rocks using fossils-25dating rocks using fossils-61dating rocks using fossils-29

It became clear that there had been significant changes in the Earth's topography over time and that these changes could neither be accounted for by natural processes operating during the brief nor by the postulated Noachian flood.Once we understand what we actually need to do we can apply the same principles to radioactive dating, and see if the methods do what they are claimed to do.Picture a swimmer competing in a 1,500 metre race and an observer with an accurate wristwatch.Evolution only gained significant momentum after the theory of evolution, published by Charles Darwin in November 1859, implied that man was merely another product of life on earth, with origins shared by the other creatures and not its ultimate purpose. Wallace proposed the same theory at a joint presentation to the Linnaean Society in London .Without the universal acceptance of the principle of evolution, there is no chance for the serious proposal of holism.